Coach first, police last
Every product decision starts with one question: does this help the employee use AI better, or does it just watch them? Coapro exists to coach people in the moment — a report after the fact teaches no one anything.
Our mission
AI adoption that puts people first
Most AI tools promise efficiency by automating people away. Coapro takes the opposite bet: protect what matters, teach what helps, and give every employee a fair path to use AI well—not just the early adopters.
Why we exist
AI arrived in the workplace faster than any policy, training program, or procurement process could absorb. Organizations responded with bans, then with surveillance tools that watch everything and teach no one. Both fail the same way: employees keep using AI, in the dark, without a fair path to build the skill their careers now require.
Coapro is a third option. A published AI use policy—your standards, in your language—enforced at the moment of use, with coaching instead of punishment. Employees learn what good looks like under your rules while the work stays protected. Security gets structured, audit-friendly evidence. Nobody gets a score, a ranking, or a file.
We are a mission-driven, for-profit software company. We think the durable business is the one where the monitored employee is better off for the product existing — that is the whole design test every feature must pass.
What we believe
Six values, stated the way we operate — each one verifiable in the product, the contracts, or a public page.
People are the point, not the problem
Most AI tools promise efficiency by automating people away. We take the opposite bet: the workforce that knows how to use AI well is the asset. Every employee gets a fair path to build that skill — not just the early adopters.
Narrow is a feature
We collect the smallest data set that makes coaching work — no biometrics, no screen reading, no file contents, no non-AI surfaces, and verbatim text kept days, not months. What we don't collect is on a public page, verifiable by installing the product.
Honesty beats adjectives
Our security posture says what we don't have — no SOC 2 yet, and we say so — instead of implying an audit that hasn't happened. The honest answer to a hard question builds more trust than a slogan, in security and in sales.
The law is a floor, made walkable
Monitoring notice duties, consent, the EU AI Act — most vendors bury them in a PDF. We explain them in plain language on a public page and make the compliant path the default in the product.
Your data stays yours
Row-level security keeps each organization's data separated, employees see everything collected about them on their own page, and we train our own models — customer prompts are never sent anywhere for training.
What this means in practice
- Employees see their own record. My AI Usage shows everything collected about you, without asking anyone — and verbatim content is deleted on a customer-configured window, seven days by default, never more than thirty.
- Notice comes before collection. No content is ingested until an administrator attests, on the record, that everyone affected received written notice. The attestation is versioned and disclosed in plain language.
- Managers get patterns, never prompts. Coaching visibility is practice-area summaries about direct reports. Verbatim text is role-restricted and every access is logged.
- The honest gaps stay visible. No SOC 2 yet. Pen test pending. We publish what we don't have next to what we do, because a security review should be a conversation with facts.